Saturday, December 24, 2005

Bill of Rights; Amendment One.


(This Post originally ran on 3-5-05.)

Bill of Rights; Amendment I:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."


Look closely at the above amendment. Do you see anything regarding separation of church and state? No? That’s because it isn’t there.

Now, before I dive headlong into to this post, allow me, please, to say that after years of wrestling with this, I have concluded that if the “separation clause” was, indeed, in the Constitution, I could probably support it. As it is, I haven’t that choice… because it simply isn’t there.

The Supreme Court is deciding an issue, I happen to believe, they have no authority to even consider. The case of the Ten Commandments displayed on public property, namely courthouse lawns and such. Elsewhere in the Constitution, it is plainly stated that if it is not in the Constitution, then the matter is left up to the states. Anything.

This issue should be a state matter… decided by each separate state’s legislatures and, when necessary, their state courts.

What we have here is another case of the Supreme Court assuming powers it doesn’t have…again. When will the Congress grow the cajones to rein in that runaway court?

Maybe the time has come, if not it is surely approaching, when we have to convene a Constitutional Convention and clear up a few things. One would be to amend the Constitution to allow term limits for ALL Federal Judges including the Supreme Court Justices. The insulation of lifetime appointments has the effect of cutting them off from any contact with the real world, outside their tiny little world, and results in a disconnect with the American people. The same thing has happened to Congress. The answer to the Congressional disconnect? Term limits. Well, guess what, the Court ruled Term Limits are unconstitutional. I wonder why.

We are faced with the oligarchy thing again. Our freedoms are being eroded away and we have no recourse. To continue along this course is bound to end in a very unpleasant mess. I would advise the government to review the events of
the 1850’s with even closer attention to the events of 1861 through 1865. The underlying cause of that unpleasant period was overbearing government. The Congress and the Federal Judiciary would do well to consider that period in our history because, as we all know, history has a way of repeating itself. The US government didn’t believe it could happen then, either.

The people must have recourse. We are well past being tired of the legislation coming out of the Federal Courts including the Supreme Court.

The great unwashed out here in the hinterlands have begun the inevitable rumbling and the momentum will only build. Congress would do well to be attentive to these dissatisfied constituents and put the brakes on the Federal Courts. Congress has the power. The question is, are they men, and women, enough to do it?

“Longstreet”

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

"We are faced with the oligarchy thing again. Our freedoms are being eroded away and we have no recourse."

Agreed. Bush has broken the law, violated the Constitution and made us more vulnerable to terrorism by fanning the flames of anti-US hatred worldwide.

Anonymous said...

"Agreed. Bush has broken the law, violated the Constitution and made us more vulnerable to terrorism by fanning the flames of anti-US hatred worldwide." .....

You cannot be serious! In order for you to be serious, you would have to be completely disconnected from reality. But then, again, the Democrat party IS disconnected from reality. The more they rant and rave, the more Bush's ratings climb.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Davis,
I've read your posts they are all the same message, are you a white house spin doctor echoing their catch phrases like fox, cnn, abc, cbs, nbc? I think you have lost touch with reality. And for you Mr. longstreet The first 5 words of the first Amendment should have been the end of it. "Congress shall make no law." What a concept! Anything after those five words limits the powers of government, NO limit the freedoms of the citizens.