Friday, December 12, 2008

Global Governance=Global Government=One World Government

Global Governance=Global Government=One World Government
By J. D. Longstreet

Of all the things that concern me, the thing which actually frightens me most is the possibility of a One World Government on this planet. And surveying the world situation today one would have to admit it sure looks as if the stage is being set for just that… the move to Global Governance (The PC term is Global Governance, or what you and I know as a One World Government).

I have thought about this one world government thing for a good forty years now and, for the life of me, I cannot see how it can be done and maintain a democratic form of one world government. In fact, I am convinced it cannot. I have concluded that the best we can hope for is a benevilent worldwide dictatorship… under the auspices of, you guessed it, the United Nations, that spawn of Hell itself!

The folks we often refer to as “the powers that be” need a world wide crisis, and then another and another, until the citizens of this globe are so beaten down they will be willing to accept such a single government, spanning the globe, just to obtain some relief.

The current world wide financial crisis seems ready made as the stepping stone for a series of world wide crises which, if I am correct, may follow, fairly quickly, on the heels of the current crises.

Money. It’s money that is the triggering this crisis. I have to tell you I have an awful feeling that soon after the first of the year the Congress is going to declare a banking holiday. When they do, and if they do, it will bring home the depth of the danger Americans are in... finally. "Wiped out" will be the phrase of the day and it will be accurately discriptive.

Doubt not that there is a plan on someone’s desk, or locked securely in someone’s vault, to take the drive toward a one world government into the second phase. Believe me when I tell you, that I am convinced that we are one step closer to that one world government than we have ever been and one could even go on record as saying we are right on schedule, or very nearly on schedule, for it’s establishment.

Gideon Rachman, of the Financial Times, has a piece entitled: “And Now For A World Government”. We recommend you read it. You’ll find it at:

If I understood what Mr. Rachman has written, he, too, sees the table set for “global governance”. I shuddered, more than once, as I read it. You’ll find many more such articles on the Internet. Some will scare the bejesus out of you, especially Americans.

Some have said coming events toward the initial establishment of the OWG will have Americans reaching for their guns. I sincerely hope that is an accurate statement. For I, as an American, am convinced that it will be the end of America.
As I said above, I am convinced a One world Government cannot exist, realistically, as a democratic form of government. It will, of necessity, have to be a dictatorship to survive. Only a dictatorship could bring the fear and intimidation that will be necessary to mold, and maintain 193 separate countries in line as a single planet-wide country. Not to mention the perpetual state of war that will exist on the planet, somewhere, all the time.

May I suggest you take the time to read up on the myriads of material available on the Internet about the coming One World Government? It is a must if you value your freedom, especially Americans. As I said above, some are suggesting a banking holiday soon after the first of 2009. That will be a sign that “The Program” is underway.

Some have been suggesting that we Americans buy up as much ammo as we can and conceal it. Much the same is being suggested for our personal weapons. I have to tell you that considering where the world seems to be heading... that is beginning to resemble sage advice.

J. D. Longstreet


Wha Wadna Fecht For Charlie said...

“Not to mention the perpetual state of war that will exist on the planet, somewhere, all the time.”

As opposed to the peaceful times that we now reside in? LoL!

Having read Rachman’s article, the average 10 year old could pick holes in his argument. I draw your attention to this part:

‘The EU has suffered a series of humiliating defeats in referendums, when plans for ‘ever closer union’ have been referred to the voters. In general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters. International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic.’

Enough said.

Frank said...

One world government isn't a democracy. It's about a controlling party having all the money and all the power and all the resources (including the human resources) at their disposal. The people in power will not stop there, wars will be started to keep population in check, we will continue down the path of a fascist police state, where all the money and power go to the top. It is a sad day for individuals, but at least big business will flourish. Hey that sounds like the Country club wing of the G.O.P.'s wet dream. As a republican sir, you should be "all-in" for that, you and Rush Limbaugh wonder what they’ll do once he doesn't need you to push his agenda. Actually both of our mainstream parties candidates are pushed by the force behind this, and the biggest culprit is our media that keeps this corporate agenda just far enough out of the news that well, you might get a glimpse of it, you might feel the pull of the tide, but most uninformed people do not and if you speak of it they call you "the fringe", look at Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich for a prime example. The duopoly of our political system and the fear of people to actually vote out side of it is to blame.