Rubio
Must Disqualify Himself from High Office
By JB
Williams
If so-called constitutionalists were better acquainted
with the Constitution (Charters of Freedom), they would not be supporting Marco Rubio for an office
he is not eligible to hold and they would have already removed Barack Hussein
Obama from the office he currently holds
fraudulently.
Marco Rubio is in the unique position to solve our
nations greatest problem, to remove a foreign agent currently assaulting
America from within the Oval Office and set the nation back on a constitutional
course towards freedom and liberty. Rubio has an opportunity to be a true
American hero. Will he be?
Because Rubio was dragged into the political spotlight by
Tea Party folks in desperate search of new conservative leadership, and because he
shares in common with Obama, constitutional ineligibility for the offices of
president and vice president under Article II requirements, he is uniquely
positioned to bring down the most anti-American regime to ever hold political
power in the United States.
Unlike birthers who are trying to disqualify Obama on
the basis of his unconfirmed place of birth (native born status), which is still
in question due to Obamas fraudulent efforts to hide his real past and true
identity, using nondisclosure and forged documents to remain a total mystery, --
true constitutionalists who have studied the matter completely and allowed the
facts to emerge without partisan purpose, know the whole
truth.
1) The foundations for America are stated in the preamble
to the Declaration of Independence. Pay particular attention to the parts
highlighted.
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States
of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary
for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a
decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the
causes which impel them to the separation.
Contrary to contemporary teachings by revisionists, the
legal precepts for everything our Founders created is NOT "British common law"
which we separated from via the Declaration and the American Revolution. It is
"The laws of Nature and of Nature's God," as stated in the preamble to our
nations founding document, The Declaration. Just as freedom and liberty are
natural rights inalienable by men, so is the right of Natural Born
Citizenship.
2) Revisionists claim that Natural Born Citizen is not
defined in the Constitution. However, the US Constitution does not have a
definitions section; therefore, it provides no definition for any of the words
or terms used in that document. Of course, as the Charters of Freedom were written in plain simple English so that any citizen
could read and comprehend their rights and the limited functions of the
government bodies they were to form, no definitions were needed. Everyone alive
at the time knew the true meaning of every word and every term, including
Natural Born Citizen. But 236 years later, dumbed down by revisionist
propaganda, Americans may have to do a little homework to rediscover basic
truths.
3) During that period in history, the framing of the
Charters of Freedom, our Founders left a perfect record of their concerns
and intents in the Federalist Papers. Anyone not able to comprehend the simple English
carefully crafted in the Charters of Freedom can study the thoughts behind those
words in the Federalist Papers. If you do not know the Federalists Papers, you do not know the
Constitution.
4) There is no guess-work or ambiguity
We know from
reading the correspondences of our Founders, that they borrowed the concepts for
the Charters of Freedom (Natural Law - Laws of Nature - God's Law -
inalienable Law of Nations) -- from the internationally recognized authority on
the subject at the time, Vattel, recorded in French and later translated to
English, The Law of Nations, written on the inalienable laws of nature
respected by all nations and inescapable by man. [Most of the Founding Fathers were as fluent
in French as they were English.] Included, was the term Natural Born
Citizen, a citizen by the laws of nature, not the laws of man, in fact,
inalienable by the laws of man.
In Vattel's Law of Nations, he defines the term Natural Born Citizen, not in one
sentence, but in several sections, 211 233 of Book One. One truly seeking the
truth about our Charters of Freedom and Natural Born Citizenship should read the
entire Law of Nations, it is a brilliant work on Natural Law and it is
in fact the cornerstone of the Charters of Freedom created by our Founders.
But in short, Vattel defines Natural Born Citizen as
follow;
NOTE: "Birthers" mistakenly (or intentionally)
cherry-pick a single sentence from several sections on the subject, discarding
all else, including the actual definition. - "The natives, or natural-born
citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens." - This is
NOT the definition of Natural Born Citizen. It is only a general statement
affirming that natives are born in country and naturals are born of citizen
parents.
Vattel goes on to define Natural Born Citizen and the
reasoning behind it...
* "As the society cannot exist and perpetuate
itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children
naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their
rights."
** "The country of the fathers is therefore
that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit
consent."
*** "I say, that, in order to be of the country,
it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for,
if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and
not his country."
This is why Barack Hussein Obama is a total fraud,
constitutionally ineligible for office. Unfortunately, so is Marco Rubio, among
others.
If Marco Rubio is the great American Son he portrays
himself to be, the great young constitutionally conservative leader that so many
Tea Party folks hope that he is, he must take a stand for the US Constitution
and America right now, as only he can do.
Because many of his loyal followers have such high hopes
for his political future, Marco Rubio can secure that future by taking the stand
that only he is positioned to take right now.
Unless and until so-called "constitutionalists" get
Article II right, they can forget every right they think they have....because if
Article II does not exist in force or affect, neither does any other part of
those founding documents that protect the Natural Rights of all American
citizens.
I call upon Marco Rubio to stand and become the great
leader he wants to be, the leader so many believe him to be. I call upon Marco
Rubio to stand and tell ALL Americans that he is ineligible for the offices of
president and vice president, as the natural born son of a Father who was a
citizen of Cuba (not the United States) at the time of his
birth.
Man-made statutes generously gave Rubio and many others
like him, American citizenship, via the 14th Amendment, our immigration and naturalization amendment
governing the citizenship rights of immigrants through naturalization, or native born
rights.
Rubio is a citizen of the United States by way of
man-made laws, not Natural Law.
Likewise, no matter whether Obama was born in Hawaii or
Kenya, his natural birth Father was at no time in his life a citizen of the
United States. Therefore, Obamas Father could not confer to Barack Hussein
Obama II that which he did not possess, U.S.
Citizenship.
Marco Rubio can solve this entire issue and much more. He
can stop Obamas Marxist march off the cliff and save the country he claims to
care about deeply, as well as freedom and liberty in America. He can do so by
standing up before the nation and the world, proclaiming himself ineligible for
high office and demanding that Barack Hussein Obama be immediately removed from
office and charged with high treason for the most horrific fraud ever
perpetrated on the American public and the world.
If Rubio refuses to do so, he is NOT what so many had
hoped. He will be nothing more than just another political fraud seeking
personal gain at the expense of the US Charters of Freedom and the future of
freedom and liberty, not just here, but throughout the free
world.
If Article II no longer matters, nothing in the Charters
of Freedom matters anymore.
I call upon Marco Rubio to take a stand and end this
nightmare. Stand and tell the people the truth Mr. Rubio, or become just another
disappointment to the people, pandering to the captive Tea Party audience but no
less complicit in the massive fraud.
DO IT NOW
Before a second fraudulent
inauguration!
Co-Founder
www.PatriotsUnion.org
www.VeteranDefenders.org
www.ThePatriotsNews.com
*************************
www.PatriotsUnion.org
www.VeteranDefenders.org
www.ThePatriotsNews.com
*************************
JB Williams is a writer on matters of
history and American politics with more than 3000 pieces published over a
twenty-year span. He has a decidedly conservative reverence for the Charters of
Freedom, the men and women who have paid the price of freedom and liberty for
all, and action oriented real-time solutions for modern challenges. He is a
Christian, a husband, a father, a researcher, writer and a business owner. He
is co-founder of action organizations The
United States Patriots Union, a civilian parent organization for The
Veteran Defenders of America. He is also co-founder of The
North American Law Center, a citizen run investigative legal research and
activism organization preparing to take on American's greatest legal battles.
Williams receives mail at: jb.uspu@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment