Thursday, August 10, 2006

Northern States' Complicity in Slavery !!!


It gives me great pleasure to , once again, present a piece written by a friend, and a fellow compatiot of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, NC Division, Mr. Bill Ward of Salisbury, NC.

Bill, and I, share a deep interest in the country's past, especially the Civil War years. As members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, we have taken an oath to see that the Confederate Soldier is not forgotten and... in order to do that... it is vital that we study the period... and facts of the period. We have found that so much of what is offered as history today is simply flawed, or untrue, or both.

The Northern state's "complicity" in Slavery in the US has been greatly downplayed and even hidden. As a result, the South has been unjustly tarred as the villian of the Civil War.

Last summer, I had the good fortune to speak before a group about this same topic. So, I was delighted when Bill's article arrived in my inbox.

After reading Bill's review of this book, I would add my endorsement. Americans NEED to know the true history of this country, the good, the bad, and the ugly. It is who were are. It is what made us who we are today.

So, please take the few minutes necessary to read Bill's piece below. Northerner, or Southerner, you'll be glad you did!

Longstreet
************************************


"Complicity: How the North Promoted,Prolonged, and Profited from Slavery," by Anne Farrow, Joel Lang andJennifer Frank. Ballantine Books. 2005. 269 pp. with index. $25.95.

By Bill Ward, For Salisbury Post

Popular history typically has presented the anti-bellum North as the great liberator and defender of humanity. Conversely, the same history depicts the Southern states as the bastion of enslavers and oppressors of rights.

However, "Complicity: How the North Promoted, Prolonged, andProfited from Slavery," shows what serious investigators of U.S. history have known for years: the extensive complicity of the Northern states in the slave trade.


Those states not only made enormous profits importing slaves on Northern ships through New England seaports, they enjoyed the fruits of slave labor on northern farms and reaped profits from textile manufacturing with cotton, the leading cash crop in early America, grown mostly in the Southern states by more slave labor.

The authors, Anne Farrow, Joel Lang and Jennifer Frank, are reporters for the Hartford Courant newspaper at Hartford, Conn. It appears that history books, written mostly by Northern historians, have been as universally derelict in providing the whole truth in Northern schools about our country's growing pains as they have in the South.

"Complicity" contains a few minor historic slips, not unexpected from journalists as opposed to historians delving into history.

However, instead of dwelling on minor faults, much solid information, perhaps little-known to the average history reader, makes this book worthwhile.

For example, in the 18th century, black slaves made up nearly one-fifth of New York City's population. Two major slave revolts in the city in the mid-18th century resulted in 31 slaves and four whites being either hanged or burned alive at the stake, a favored form of punishment for blacks in several Northern states.

And who would have thought there had been plantations with slaves in Rhode Island and Connecticut? But in the Narragansett area of Rhode Island in the mid-18th century, a plantation system was in place using slave labor to raise horses, cattle and dairy cows. In acreage and numbers of slaves, they rivaled the plantations of Virginia's Tidewater region.

Rhode Island also led America's transatlantic slave trade,originating nearly 1,000 voyages to Africa and carrying at least 100,000 captives back across the Atlantic. The captains and crews were virtually all veteran New England seamen.

And in the decades before the Civil War, the port of New York became the hub of an enormously profitable illegal slave trade. Manhattan shipyards built vessels that held between 600 and 1,000 captive Africans. A conservative estimate is that during the peak years of the illegal trade, 1859 and 1860, at least two such slave ships left lower Manhattan every month.

Of the interesting history it covers, "Complicity" reveals that the illegal Northern slave trade continued on up into the time of the Civil War. The treatment of slaves aboard Northern slave ships surpassed harsh; it was absolutely brutal, resulting in the deaths of large numbers of the slave cargo, including children.

Nathaniel Gordon, a ship's captain from Portland, Maine, was probably the first and only American tried and executed for crimes resulting in the illegal slave trade. He was hanged on Feb. 21, 1862, some 10 months after Fort Sumter was fired on.

By 1860, New England contained 472 cotton mills using hundreds of millions of pounds of Southern grown cotton. Hundreds of other textile mills were scattered around the North, including New York state and New Jersey. Huge manufacturing profits were invested in banks, insurance companies and railroads. But the engines that drove those enterprises were the mammoth textile mills in Massachusetts, southern Maine and New Hampshire.

Only the large banks in Manhattan or London had the capacity to extend credit to the owners of the 75,000 large Southern cotton plantations between planting and selling their crop.

Northerners also enjoyed excellent livings catering to wealthy Southern planters in the importation of fine china, silver, soaps, wines, jewelry and entertainment — anything to enhance their quality of life.

In the summer, large numbers of wealthy Southerners came from the Deep South to escape the sultry climate. Southern dollars were more than welcome at businesses, from the finest hotels and restaurants to theaters,advertised in publications directed to prospective Southern clientele. Wealthy Northerners and Southerners, socially and economically, were linked by the common threads spun from cotton.

The social and economic relationships between the North and South seemed almost enough to have prevented the Civil War. Any Southern planter who wanted his daughter to have "a solid education of the highest order"could send her to New York to the Rutgers Female Institute "in one of the most healthful, quiet, and moral neighborhoods in the city," while the traditionally liberal Harvard College academically supported white supremacy.

Louis Agassiz, a renowned Swiss zoologist and geologist, served a 20-year career as a Harvard professor. Mentored by Samuel George Morton, one of the most eminent physicians in Philadelphia, Agassiz did research to prove the inferiority of blacks. He supposedly showed that blacks were not even of the same species as whites, helping to justify slavery.

In Chapter 10 of "Complicity," the seldom-mentioned ivory industry — such as in piano keys and billiard balls — and the two small Connecticut towns of Ivoryton and Deep River, where ivory manufacturing thrived, are discussed under the title of "Plunder for Pianos."

To produce music for the middle class, as many as 2 million African lives were sacrificed to harvest elephant ivory.

Every history and social studies teacher today should make"Complicity" a part of their reading for their own continuing education. And it should be required reading for every middle and high schoolstudent.

Bill Ward is a historian and writer who lives in Salisbury, NC.

6 comments:

LittleOleLady said...

I was reading somethingnot long ago about the times before the Civil War and I came across something that said that even while some people up North were paying lip service to black people not being slaves that many of those same people either had interest in or owned plantations in the south and were complicit themselves in slavery.

Brings one word to mind.. hypocrites.

Hope you don't mind if I post it on my blog.. with a link back here of course..

And another thing while I am thinking of it.. since you are a member of the SCV.. is there a group for ladies that have confederate ancestors?

Longstreet said...

Post away!

I won't mind, and I feel certain Bill won't mind, either.

For ladies with Confedeate Ancestors there is the UDC... the "United Daughters of the Confederacy". The organization most closely related to the SCV is "The Order of the Confederate Rose". We work closely with either or both.

confederateson said...

The entire country was guilty of bad treatment of the black race at that time. North and South had the same view toward blacks as being inferior. This was also the view of white Europe. I believe God brought judgement on our Country partly because of our treatment of the black race, but mainly because both North and South used slavery as a battering ram to fracture His Church for which His Son died. I also am an SCV member, but do not believe that the South was right about everything. Below is a link to one of my posts dealing with the issue.


http://twcmx.blogspot.com/2006/06/one-reason-above-all-other_114980754167638808.html

Longstreet said...

Of Course the South wasn't right about EVERYTHING. Just MOST things! HA!

No... Slavery was wrong! Indisputably wrong. But, the point is... the WHOLE story is not being told and the one-sided tale taught our chldren has resulted in the South being painted as the bad guy, the ONLY bad guy in the country. That is flat out wrong.

I want to see the whole story told. I want to see it taught. The good, the bad, and the ugly.

I love the SCV... but I think we could do more than we are currently doing toward educating the public.

Anonymous said...

Longstreet,
I am from Ohio, I am verry politically opposed to alot of your views and even I know there were more slaves in N.Y. than in Charolette (pardon the spelling). I also know that "Old Glory" flew over slavery longet than the "Stars and Bars" did. So for you to say, "the South being painted as the bad guy, the ONLY bad guy in the country." I don't get that, I'm not saying you're lying, I'm saying I just don't get it. I am just a dumb yankee liberal and I know some truths, not all but some, enought to not vilify either side. I also know the war was not a Civil one (no pun intended.) The South wasn't trying to overthrow Philadelphia (then the capitol) any more than George Washington was trying to over throw England. They just wanted the ability to be a self-governing independent nation (C.S.A.) If some dumb yankee liberal knows that, and I know better than to trust federal mandated texts (either conservative or liberal) then i have no doubt the "Good ole boys" in the south can figure out the reality of the great lie that the C.S.A. was plundered under.
Good Day Suh!

confederateson said...

"I want to see the whole story told. I want to see it taught. The good, the bad, and the ugly."


Well said.