Another
Massacre in Another Gun-Free Zone
By JB
Williams
Who ever thought that our military bases would be
vulnerable to the sort of mass assault that took place at the Naval Shipyard in D.C. or at Ft. Hood in November of 2009? Who
thought that our military installations would be gun-free zones, allowing a lone
gunman like Nidal Malik Hasan or Aaron Alexis to murder a dozen innocent people before
being taken down by local law enforcement?
Has anyone noticed the steady rise in these types of
events just since Barack Obama took office?
·
April 3, 2009 - 13 killed, 4 injured: Binghamton,
N.Y.
·
Nov. 5, 2009 - 13 killed, 32 injured: Ft. Hood,
Texas
·
Aug. 3, 2010 - 8 killed, 2 injured: Manchester,
Conn.
·
Jan. 8, 2011 - 6 killed, 11 injured: Tucson,
Ariz.
·
Oct. 12, 2011 - 8 killed, 1 injured: Seal Beach,
Calif.
·
April 2, 2012 - 7 killed, 3 injured:
Oakland
·
July 20, 2012 - 12 killed, 58 injured: Aurora,
Colo.
·
Aug. 5, 2012 - 6 killed, 3 injured: Oak Creek,
Wis.
·
Sept. 28, 2012 - 6 killed, 2 injured: Minneapolis,
Minn.
·
Oct. 21, 2012 - 3 dead, 4 injured: Brookfield,
Wis.
·
Dec. 14, 2012 - 27 killed, one injured: Newtown,
Conn.
·
June 7, 2013 - 5 killed: Santa
Monica
·
Sept. 16, 2013 - 13 killed, 3 injured: Washington,
D.C.
In addition to five successful terror strikes on U.S.
soil on Obama’s watch, an unprecedented thirteen separate cases of mass murder
have taken place on U.S. soil since Barack Obama was sworn into office on
January 20, 2009. 127 killed and 124 injured, all of them innocent Americans
randomly targeted for death and all of them targeted in “gun-free” zones.
Three occurred on “gun-free” school campuses. Four
occurred on public grounds in largely “gun-free” zones, in states or cities with
our nation’s strictest gun laws. Three occurred in the work place, also
“gun-free” zones, and two occurred in “gun-free” zones on Military bases. One
occurred at a “gun-free” place of worship.
None of the shooters were “right-wing extremists” or Tea
Party types. One has been labeled a White Supremacist. Three had military
experience. Three were left-wing latchkey kids. Two were disgruntled
ex-employees. Three were immigrants and one is being labeled a black
Buddhist.
Most of these shooters had previous run-ins with the law.
Several were being medicated for types of depression. All of them had signals in
their past that had been ignored by those around
them.
According to early reports, the Naval Shipyard shooter
Aaron Alexis had been arrested twice before on gun
related charges – was released from military service due to numerous acts of
insubordination – and had been diagnosed and treated for PTSD related to
9.11.01
According to his friends, Alexis was “unhappy with
America…” specifically, the federal government and Veteran Affairs, whom he
believed had mistreated him for years. Still, he had Secret Security clearance
and authorized access to the D.C. Naval Shipyard where he allegedly gunned down
twelve co-workers.
There seems to be a clear pattern
here…
1.
Events are on the rise under
Obama
2.
They are all angry with government for one
reason or another
3.
Mass murder gunmen come in different shapes,
sizes, colors and nationalities
4.
They are misfits and malcontents of one sort
or another
5.
Most played violent video games before acting
out
6.
They target random people in their
rage
7.
They ALWAYS target defenseless people in “gun-free
zones”
Natural assumptions on the basis of this
pattern…
1.
Obama is not good for
America
2.
Government should stop angering
citizens
3.
No standard MO for
gunmen
4.
Entitled people are always
discontent
5.
Violent video games are a bad
idea
6.
Anyone can be a
target
7.
THERE SHOULD BE NO “GUN-FREE ZONES”
The moral to this story should be quite clear… Don’t be
caught dead in a “gun-free-zone” where only the criminals are
armed.
Why is this happening with increasing
regularity?
Because the only private sector Obama has stimulated is
gun and ammo sales. Because Obama has the worst economic, foreign policy, race
relations, national security and public unity record in American history and
other than guns sales and great frustration, Obama has stimulated nothing but
widespread anger, here and abroad.
Social media allows news to travel a light speed. Be the
news good or bad, it travels fast these days and it is available to everyone, be
their intentions good or evil. I’m not suggesting that every person should be
armed, but rather that decent honest and responsible citizens should never be
denied their right to bear arms in self-defense.
Let the people blog, tweet and post this… ONLY THE
CRIMINALS ARE ARMED IN GUN-FREE ZONES! Thugs seldom target people able to defend
themselves. Make the truth go viral…
JB Williams, Co-Founder
1 comment:
I agree with most everything but the violent video games. For me, this is no different than blaming movies with violence, or songs with suicide lyrics. Millions of people play or watch or listen to forms of entertainment, and do NOT act out. If anything, it is a release of anger. I find video games fun and engaging, and even though they may be graphic sometimes, I know there is no connection to reality. In life, there are no health packs to revive me after being shot and other such stupid stuff. Can you blame Need for Speed games on increased traffic infractions. Of Assassin's Creed on increased bow and arrow shootings. It would be like blaming Wii Fit for increased membership in gyms and people excessively working out a lot.
Yes, maybe these people did engage in these things, but so does a lot of others. By blaming games, you are blaming an inanimate things for the person's actions. Saying that video games make them feel like they can commit murder, is much like saying someone owning a gun makes them feel empowered to commit murder as well. And for me, blaming anything other than the sick individual is not only wrong, but give the govt the idea to start banning those things. Do we really want the govt to stop adventure movies such as Die Hard? Should we not be allowed to play Call of Duty? And all Ozzy Osbourne records must be pulled and destroyed? If that is the case, then maybe all news programs on violence or world affairs should be banned, becasue they may people upset and angry as well. Heck, mad enought to do something about it if the wrong idiot gets ideas in his sick head. So ban it all...right.
Please, do not blame these things. It is just as insulting as blaming the gun itself. And IMO, that is wrong.
Post a Comment